Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), has vowed to work against former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s presidential bid in 2027.
This declaration was made by Wike’s media aide, Lere Olayinka, in response to Atiku’s recent comments that he had
no regrets about not choosing Wike as his running mate in the 2023 presidential election.
Atiku had revealed that a committee recommended three potential running mates, including Wike, but ultimately
chose former Delta State Governor Ifeanyi Okowa. Olayinka dismissed Atiku’s remarks, stating that Wike also had no
regrets about not being selected.
Furthermore, Olayinka claimed that Wike contributed to Atiku’s loss in 2023 and would work to ensure another defeat
in 2027. This statement highlights the deepening rift between Wike and Atiku, which dates back to the contentious 2022 PDP primaries.
Atiku has announced the formation of a coalition of opposition leaders to challenge President Bola Tinubu in the
2027 general elections. However, Wike’s opposition to Atiku’s presidential bid may pose a significant challenge to his ambitions.
You may also like: Wike Vows Not to Interfere with Rivers Assembly’s Constitutional Duties
The battle for Nigeria’s presidency is already taking shape, with various political alignments shifting ahead of the
2027 elections. Atiku’s presidential bid faces opposition not only from Wike but also from other quarters.
Atiku remained cautious about his plans to contest in 2027, stating that a strong political platform must first be
established. He emphasized Nigeria’s need for experienced leadership, likening the situation to the formation of the
All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2014.
Atiku’s announcement has sparked speculation over who will lead the opposition coalition, with notable figures like
former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi and ex-Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai rumored to be key players.
The PDP faces challenges ahead of the 2027 elections, including internal divisions and inefficiencies. Wike has criticized the party’s leadership structure, accusing some members of “treachery”.